Republican State Leadership Committee We Can Change Congress

Donate

Archive for July, 2010


Via North Jersey dot com

Many political experts are predicting that because of stagnant population growth, New Jersey will lose one of its 13 congressional districts to another state. Many political pundits say that it will be one of the suburban districts that will get carved up. It may lead to two incumbent Republicans facing off in a June primary for the right to appear on the ballot of the November 2012 general election.

Redistricting could have even greater consequences on the state level. Several complicated court cases, specifically Bartlett v. Strickland, McNeil v. Legislative Apportionment and others, may produce a more favorable map for New Jersey Republicans. Both parties will be vying to get a “good map.” A “good map” is one that gives a particular party a better or at least a fighting chance of securing a majority in one or both houses. In 2001, Republicans got a “bad map.”

A good Republican map could result in Republican majorities in the New Jersey Senate and Assembly in 2012. With Chris Christie in the governor’s seat and Republican majorities in both houses, 2012 could make this year look like a yawner. Big changes could come to the state if Republicans can get a “good map” and win.

Read the rest

More
Last Updated on Monday, 19 July 2010 07:37

From the San Angelo Standard Times

If redistricting weren’t so serious, it would be funny.

As Forrest Gump’s mama says about life in the 1994 movie, “It’s like a box of chocolates. You never know what you’re gonna get.”

Most folks don’t know, or care, about legislative and congressional redistricting, to be done in the legislative session beginning in January, by the legislators mostly chosen in this year’s election.

Don’t care, that is, until they see a relatively compact Austin-based congressional district split into three — one reaching to Houston, one to South Texas, and one to San Antonio and West Texas.

Read the rest

More
Tags: , , , , ,   |  Posted under Redistricting  |  Comments  No Comments
Last Updated on Friday, 16 July 2010 07:51

From the Green Bay Press Gazette

Under Barrett’s plan, lawmakers would be forced to agree on a map that would feature districts with a more equal number of Democrat and Republican voters or risk the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board taking the process out of their hands.

However, such a plan would require the approval of the very lawmakers who would be most affected by the process, which Barrett knows will be difficult.

“What it’s going to take is pressure from the public and people saying, ‘Look, we want to have this process a more representative process,'” the Milwaukee mayor said Monday during a stop at the Brown County Courthouse in Green Bay. “And I think people, whether at the state level or at the federal level, they don’t want gridlock. They don’t want partisanship. They want people who are going to work together.”

Read the rest

More
Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 07:34

From the Associated Press

“Some states use legislatures, some states use commissions and then there’s Iowa,” said Tim Storey, a senior fellow with the National Conference of State Legislatures in Denver. “The Iowa approach to redistricting is unlike any other state.”

That Legislative Services Agency prepares a map of new congressional and legislative districts, and that initial map must be submitted to the Legislature by April 1. In preparing the map, staffers can use only population data to propose districts that are as close to equal and as compact as possible.

They are banned from considering data such as voter registration or voter performance, and they don’t have access to the addresses of incumbent legislators and congressmen until after the map is prepared. Once the map is drawn, they go back and figure out which lawmakers are in which district.

“Many things make the Iowa process unique, including the prohibition on the use of political data,” Storey said.

The task will be especially tricky because Iowa is among at least nine states likely to lose a seat in Congress. That means two of the current five are likely to be paired in a new district.

The Legislature can’t amend the first plan, only vote it up or down. If it’s voted down, staffers will prepare a second, also not subject to amendment. If that plan is rejected, staffers start again and prepare a third plan, which can be amended.

Read the rest…

More
Tags: , , , , ,   |  Posted under Redistricting  |  Comments  No Comments
Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 07:29

RSLC REDMAP Rundown

Welcome to this week’s edition of REDMAP Rundown, a synopsis of redistricting news brought to you by the RSLC’s REDistricting MAjority Project (REDMAP).  This weekly email gives you the latest on what those in the Beltway, and across the country, are saying about the impending reapportionment and redistricting process.

In this week’s REDMAP Rundown: Cook sobers up the Dems, Legislatures at play, Minnesota takeover “pretty amazing,” Amendment 7 is 86’d, Arizona’s goals, New York in the balance, PA is thankful and Texas’ grown-up table.

Ranking guru, Charlie Cook wants you to “imagine sitting in Washington’s Verizon Center, listening blissfully to Carole King and James Taylor, thanks to a fast-thinking friend who managed to score four floor seats. For 50-somethings, it’s a nice place to be. Then, as the concert is winding down, four pages of poll tables of a just-released survey pop up in your BlackBerry. They are jaw-dropping numbers, not inconsistent with what you had been thinking — if anything more a confirmation of it. But the dramatic nature of the numbers brings the real world of politics crashing through what had been a most mellow evening.”  The numbers were from the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll showing Republicans with a 2-point lead on the generic congressional ballot.  “That drop-off should be enough to sober Democrats up … the recent numbers confirm that trends first spotted late last summer have fully developed into at least a Category 3 or 4 hurricane. … Given how many House seats were newly won by Democrats in 2008 in GOP districts, and given that this election is leading into an all-important redistricting year, this reversal of fortune couldn’t have happened at a worse time for Democrats.”

Lou Jacobson takes it a step further, examining the upcoming legislative elections for Governing Magazine, writing that the elections — “the last before the start of a new once-every-decade redistricting process — are unique for two reasons. According to this author’s estimates, more chambers are in play this year than in any cycle since at least 2002. Even more strikingly, the Democrats have vastly more at risk than the Republicans do.  ‘This is going to be an extremely challenging year for Democrats for a variety of reasons,’ says Tim Storey, who analyzes elections for the National Conference of State Legislatures. ‘History is not on their side. Since 1900, the party in the White House loses seats in the legislature in every midterm except for 1934 and 2002. That’s a 2-25 losing streak for the party in the White House — a tough trend to break. Add to that the fact that Democrats are riding high right now at over 55 percent of all seats, and it shapes up to be possibly the worst election for Democrats since 1994.’”

Noting Jacobson’s report, MinnPost.com’s Eric Black writes, “It would be pretty amazing, and further testimony to the deep problems Democrats are having at all levels of politics, if they lost control of either body in Minnesota, considering that they start out with massive majorities in both houses … The Repubs would need a net 21 pickups out of 134 races to gain control. And Governing says that’s not far-fetched.”

In the Florida battle over multiple redistricting ballot amendments, “A Leon County circuit judge today struck from the ballot Amendment 7, the Legislature’s redistricting amendment aimed at undermining the Fair Districts proposals to create standards in drawing legislative and congressional lines. … The Fair Districts amendments say legislative and congressional districts can’t be drawn to benefit an incumbent or political party or to deny access to minorities, and that districts must be contiguous and, where possible, compact and drawn along existing municipal or geographic boundaries.  A separate court hearing is scheduled this afternoon in Tallahassee on Amendments 5 and 6 — more legal wrangling to get those thrown off the ballot.”

“A new approach to redrawing the map of Arizona’s political districts [which was introduced after the 2000 census and moved the map-drawing task from the Legislature and governor to a five-member commission] after each census has failed to meet a primary goal of making legislative elections more competitive, an analysis by The Arizona Republic indicates.  That lack of competitiveness between Republicans and Democrats and between incumbents and challengers is likely to persist over the next decade after the legislative map again is redrawn following the 2010 census, redistricting experts say.”

The FrumForum’s John Vecchione blogs, “Albany is entirely Democratic-controlled and is loathed by the electorate.  New York is experiencing record deficits and population drain, all under unified Democratic control.  The New York Senate hangs in the balance in a year when redistricting will take place.  Retaking the Senate could prevent the worst kind of gerrymandering.”

Pennsylvania Republicans “should thank Theresa Kane,” reports the Times Tribune.  “In the May 18 primary election, Ms. Kane earned 345 write-in votes, enough to get on the Republican ballot for the 115th House District seat held since 1984 by Democratic state Rep. Ed Staback of Archbald.  In the process, the 53-year-old Olyphant real estate agent helped her party achieve something it had not in a long time.  For the first time since 1978, Republican candidates are on the November ballot for every state House and Senate seat in both Lackawanna and Luzerne counties.”  Even Democrat Sid Michaels Kavulich recognizes the gravity of the political situation.  “‘I would think they (Republicans) would go after any seat that’s open right now because the (Democratic) majority is so razor-thin in the House,’ Mr. Kavulich said.”

“There are times when it pays to have a seat at the grownups’ table – such as when lawmakers begin redrawing the state into state legislative and congressional districts.  The Texas Panhandle has just landed a major seat at that table with the appointment this week of state Sen. Kel Seliger as chairman of a select committee on redistricting.  The appointment comes from Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, the Senate’s presiding officer.  Texas is likely to gain at least three congressional seats once the next census is completed. Seliger understands the task ahead of him. It is to do what’s right by the state, but also what’s right by the region that sends him to the Legislature.”

The RSLC is the only national organization whose mission is to elect down ballot state-level Republican office-holders.  To sign up for the REDMAP Rundown, or for more information or media inquiries, please contact Adam Temple at 571.480.4891.  If you would like to receive this report in an email, please click here.

More
Posted under Redistricting  |  Comments  No Comments
Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 07:36